The Suggestion Site
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

New "Classic" Monsters

+4
trixtor
Carnage
Dark Avorian
The Empty Lord
8 posters

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty New "Classic" Monsters

Post by The Empty Lord Mon May 03, 2010 6:16 am

First topic message reminder :

Like Vampires, Werewolves, Zombies, Dragons and Witches/Wizards before them (and I'm sure many more), some creations just stick and get obscured into all sense of fiction. Dragons probably less so because they aren't human-ish — we seem to like monsters who can hide out in the open or attack at home. But what new monsters d'you reckon could make the list of classics that people write about for years to come?

Existing "Classics"
• Vampires
• Werewolves
• Zombies
• Witches/Wizards
• Demons/Possession
• Ghosts
• Constructs

Our "Classics"
• Orcs
• Weeping Angels


Last edited by 3mptylord on Mon May 03, 2010 10:13 pm; edited 5 times in total
The Empty Lord
The Empty Lord
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 7344
Age : 32
Location : Plymouth

http://3mptylord.deviantart.com/

Back to top Go down


New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by trixtor Thu May 06, 2010 9:09 am

Ahhhh... DeviantART. They hate Twilight over there (for good reason, I read the first chapter of the first book, and found that I knew the storyline already.) By the way, why is it called a "saga"? I though that was what those stories of Vikings were.

trixtor
Advocate

Number of posts : 538

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by The Empty Lord Thu May 06, 2010 9:19 am

I thought saga was just a collection of stories that run in a series. Usually when there's more than three 'cause otherwise we call it a trilogy.

Breaking Dawn seems... like a pointless addition. Isn't it a story about their daughter... and that they summarised it in a couple lines didn't fuel me with confidence. Tongue
The Empty Lord
The Empty Lord
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 7344
Age : 32
Location : Plymouth

http://3mptylord.deviantart.com/

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by Carnage Thu May 06, 2010 1:44 pm

I've seen only parts of the first twilight movie. I got forced to stand in line for an hour and a half on the opening day of new moon, and it was watchable, but was really only worth it because of who I took.

The story was interesting enough, but it would have been better if they all had Transylvanian accents.

Carnage
Initiate

Number of posts : 61
Age : 31
Location : Pennsylvania

http://myspace.com/punkocity

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by The Empty Lord Thu May 06, 2010 6:48 pm

I'd have liked it that much more if the werewolves had some element of were- in their appearance. Like when he jumped over her in the trailer and started growing fur I was like- wow, this might be cool! He turned into a timberwolf.
The Empty Lord
The Empty Lord
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 7344
Age : 32
Location : Plymouth

http://3mptylord.deviantart.com/

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by Dark Avorian Thu May 06, 2010 9:52 pm

Okay, remind me how BEING HUMAN doesn't count as the were part?
Dark Avorian
Dark Avorian
Templar
Templar

Number of posts : 3550
Age : 30
Location : Within the hallowed halls of the mighty, those known only as nobles.

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by Blaze FF8 Thu May 06, 2010 10:41 pm

I think he was talking about their wolf form. It's usually anthropomorphic.
Blaze FF8
Blaze FF8
Forum Mod
Forum Mod

Number of posts : 496
Age : 32
Location : Scotland

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by The Empty Lord Fri May 07, 2010 12:26 am

I said were- in their appearance... so yeah, what Blaze said.
The Empty Lord
The Empty Lord
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 7344
Age : 32
Location : Plymouth

http://3mptylord.deviantart.com/

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by trixtor Fri May 07, 2010 9:00 am

The series ( I took my idea of a saga from Discworld Wink ) it embodied every single romance novel cliche. These books are made to appeal to 10-15 year old girls, not the normal, civilized population of the world.
trixtor
trixtor
Advocate

Number of posts : 538
Location : North NJ.

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by Dark Avorian Fri May 07, 2010 9:51 am

Oh well I'm sorry that authors don't conform to the norm, I'm sure we'd all love it if authors always conformed to what had already been done. Personally I think a full on wolf is much cooler than some pathetic, awkward, anthropomorph
Dark Avorian
Dark Avorian
Templar
Templar

Number of posts : 3550
Age : 30
Location : Within the hallowed halls of the mighty, those known only as nobles.

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by The Empty Lord Fri May 07, 2010 9:54 am

I don't mind originality and I'm not trying to say everyone should comply to trend... and I'm sorry for offending you with my opinion (again). But people are happy to say that the vampires' unconventional reaction to light is crappy (shiny) - so why is it so bad for me to dislike the unconventional wolves. When I see the wolves I think of them ripping things apart with their mouths - it's good - but I prefer the arms that anthros have to offer. There's something to be said for a werewolf being able to hold things/you before it eats you. Smile




I have two favourites for vampire lore;
• Vampirism is spread through exchanging bodily fluids - so the victims are usually entirely disembowelled so there is no chance of them getting up. Vampires have generally heightened senses and improved physique (resilience, agility, healing time, etc). They aren't immune to damage - but it takes raw strength to rip them apart. Sensitivity to light and shiz is optional - but normally only to give the protagonists a fighting chance. Tongue
• Vampirism is something that the vampire chooses to spread - either by having the victim drink their blood or whatever. Quirky lores such as not being able to cross the threshold and sensitive to UV light are cool for storyline if nothing else. Whether the victim is killed or not is the choice of the vampire. Whether vampires have a built-in Ring of Charos depends on how crappy it's used in the story... in some it's just very good persuasive skills, but some people just cannot be persuaded. Wink

By definition there are far better things you could call a vampire. Life-force monster. The weeping angels are technically vampires... as is that where guy with mouths on his hands from Jackie Chan. And all those monsters that devour youth and age and life. Tongue


Last edited by 3mptylord on Sat May 08, 2010 1:47 am; edited 1 time in total
The Empty Lord
The Empty Lord
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 7344
Age : 32
Location : Plymouth

http://3mptylord.deviantart.com/

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by Blaze FF8 Fri May 07, 2010 7:30 pm

Originallity's wonderful, but Meyer single-handedly ruined vampires by deciding they ought to sparkle. . .
What's more, now everyone seems to be milking the vampire bandwagon! Pretty much every second young-adult author is filling their stories wuth them, so much for "originallity".

Oh well. . . it aught to be pretty interesting to see the look's on the audiences faces onc ethey see the fourth film. . .
Blaze FF8
Blaze FF8
Forum Mod
Forum Mod

Number of posts : 496
Age : 32
Location : Scotland

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by The Empty Lord Sat May 08, 2010 6:13 am

I don't understand the point of the fourth book... if it were a film trying to squeeze more money out of a franchise then I'd understand, but generally books have more respect than that. They don't usually milk fame because the author is writing for enjoyment. It's be like writers coming up with an 8th Harry Potter after finishing the 7th... not something the author wrote prior to a film. Confuse
The Empty Lord
The Empty Lord
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 7344
Age : 32
Location : Plymouth

http://3mptylord.deviantart.com/

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by trixtor Sun May 09, 2010 12:04 pm

Blaze FF8 wrote:Originallity's wonderful, but Meyer single-handedly ruined vampires by deciding they ought to sparkle. . .
What's more, now everyone seems to be milking the vampire bandwagon! Pretty much every second young-adult author is filling their stories wuth them, so much for "originallity".

Oh well. . . it aught to be pretty interesting to see the look's on the audiences faces onc ethey see the fourth film. . .


Amen to that whole post! Except for Meyer ruining vampires. She only ruined any new vampire media. Dracula is always going to be cool, whether or not new vampires sparkle (How exactly does sparkling have anything to do with dying in a very painful manner?).
trixtor
trixtor
Advocate

Number of posts : 538
Location : North NJ.

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by The Empty Lord Mon May 10, 2010 2:55 am

I like Doctor Who's explanation of why vampires don't have a reflection. It's a perception filter. Basically they've got a device that's getting into your mind and telling you what they look like - meaning your brain is creating the image. But when you're looking at a reflection your brain doesn't know what to do so it leaves it blank. Smile
The Empty Lord
The Empty Lord
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 7344
Age : 32
Location : Plymouth

http://3mptylord.deviantart.com/

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by Blaze FF8 Mon May 10, 2010 6:48 am

I'm really going off on a tangent here, but does anyone still want me to contact Ark, and ask him if he wants to join?
I, er.. kinda forgot last time I was asked. New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Icon_redface
Blaze FF8
Blaze FF8
Forum Mod
Forum Mod

Number of posts : 496
Age : 32
Location : Scotland

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by The Empty Lord Mon May 10, 2010 10:20 am

Sure Tongue
The Empty Lord
The Empty Lord
Admin
Admin

Number of posts : 7344
Age : 32
Location : Plymouth

http://3mptylord.deviantart.com/

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by Dark Avorian Mon May 10, 2010 9:41 pm

Go forth blazing fox!
Dark Avorian
Dark Avorian
Templar
Templar

Number of posts : 3550
Age : 30
Location : Within the hallowed halls of the mighty, those known only as nobles.

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by TATORZ Tue May 11, 2010 9:33 am

*is so lost in this conversation*
TATORZ
TATORZ
Forum Mod
Forum Mod

Number of posts : 2458
Age : 29
Location : USA

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by trixtor Tue May 11, 2010 10:06 am

Enter into the depths of the... wait do they still have a roleplaying forum?
trixtor
trixtor
Advocate

Number of posts : 538
Location : North NJ.

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by Blaze FF8 Tue May 11, 2010 9:05 pm

I've posted a message on one of his RP threads, but everyone's just cleared off from that thread since. Confuse
Blaze FF8
Blaze FF8
Forum Mod
Forum Mod

Number of posts : 496
Age : 32
Location : Scotland

Back to top Go down

New "Classic" Monsters - Page 2 Empty Re: New "Classic" Monsters

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum