Game Mechanics
+2
Slayer Noir
The Empty Lord
6 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Game Mechanics
First topic message reminder :
So I'm almost entirely bored of RuneScape now, and thought I'd attempt to spark some discussion on pretending we're the developers of a new game. Unlike Pallis, I want mechanics and not content.
First question; classes.
Should they be utilized like classic MMOs, or should it be entirely free? If so, how do we create multiple "best" combinations... I absolutely don't want something that sits at the top and everyone just tries to achieve.
It's hard to suggest things out of context, so feel free to take mechanics unrelated to the current discussion and intertwine them.
So I'm almost entirely bored of RuneScape now, and thought I'd attempt to spark some discussion on pretending we're the developers of a new game. Unlike Pallis, I want mechanics and not content.
First question; classes.
Should they be utilized like classic MMOs, or should it be entirely free? If so, how do we create multiple "best" combinations... I absolutely don't want something that sits at the top and everyone just tries to achieve.
It's hard to suggest things out of context, so feel free to take mechanics unrelated to the current discussion and intertwine them.
Re: Game Mechanics
Dusk. We have two separate areas to deal with these two separate pieces. It is of course possible that we could in the future think about how they might interweave, but at the moment we are keeping them separate, if you can't manage that, then please refrain from posting on this thread as it might as well be spam.
Dark Avorian- Templar
- Number of posts : 3550
Re: Game Mechanics
Hate to be Mister Negative, but I think in my perfect game mechanic there would be no preset classes - you said yourself 3mpty, that they restrict gameplay and I agree with that.
One of the things I like about RuneScape is that if they put your mind to it, anyone can do any piece of content regardless of their origins. With preset classes, you would miss out on stuff, and that sucks for the player and wastes developers time...
One of the things I like about RuneScape is that if they put your mind to it, anyone can do any piece of content regardless of their origins. With preset classes, you would miss out on stuff, and that sucks for the player and wastes developers time...
Slayer Noir- Partisan
- Number of posts : 1248
Age : 30
Location : Great Britain
Re: Game Mechanics
If you're making content that only 50% of people can play due to classes, you've either got to develop double the content (and that takes time) or give your players less to do. Compared to making content that anyone can enjoy eventually, that's a waste of time.
Slayer Noir- Partisan
- Number of posts : 1248
Age : 30
Location : Great Britain
Re: Game Mechanics
So many games utilize this system, it's obviously not a problem.
You could argue that the everyone-can-use system is equally a wastes much time. Look at RuneScape, there's content designed for their semi-classes; but everyone's just aspiring for the best combination, thus rendering everything else redundant. At least restricting the three classes would mean that there are three "best combinations".
I'm not saying any method is the best. I would rather some sort of tree system... where you start of "plain" and specialize. But this would inevitably lead to the same locked-class dilemma you pose-- even if people hybrid--because there will be content that is unusable by players at any part of the tree.
You could always create a single class that implements the two main classes. Think Fable... melee is a staple, it's the base. Then you can get ranged weapons and learn spells, but it's not overly viable to just use bows/spells. I said two main classes because ranged is still physical damage, and things that have weaknesses to certain damages types don't distinguish bows from swords.
You could argue that the everyone-can-use system is equally a wastes much time. Look at RuneScape, there's content designed for their semi-classes; but everyone's just aspiring for the best combination, thus rendering everything else redundant. At least restricting the three classes would mean that there are three "best combinations".
I'm not saying any method is the best. I would rather some sort of tree system... where you start of "plain" and specialize. But this would inevitably lead to the same locked-class dilemma you pose-- even if people hybrid--because there will be content that is unusable by players at any part of the tree.
You could always create a single class that implements the two main classes. Think Fable... melee is a staple, it's the base. Then you can get ranged weapons and learn spells, but it's not overly viable to just use bows/spells. I said two main classes because ranged is still physical damage, and things that have weaknesses to certain damages types don't distinguish bows from swords.
Re: Game Mechanics
Well, obviously, you're the expert. I still hold my opinion but will accept yours due to your superior knowledge... I hope you'll at least consider the concerns and avoid making hundreds of classes that each restrict the player to 1% of the game.
A tree system sounds good, but perhaps instead of starting plain, you could have a head start of sorts in one discipline - like starting RuneScape with a ranged or magic level of 10? Sound plausible?
A tree system sounds good, but perhaps instead of starting plain, you could have a head start of sorts in one discipline - like starting RuneScape with a ranged or magic level of 10? Sound plausible?
Slayer Noir- Partisan
- Number of posts : 1248
Age : 30
Location : Great Britain
Re: Game Mechanics
No need to sound so sarcy. I wasn't saying your idea was bad, merely asking how you justify it wastes time.
I like single class systems. I said from the start that I will play Devil's Advocate. I want us to develop something awesome.
I like single class systems. I said from the start that I will play Devil's Advocate. I want us to develop something awesome.
Re: Game Mechanics
Sorry if that came across sarcastic, it wasn't meant to. I guess what I'm trying to say is I can't really justify myself any more: as I said at the start I'm no expert on game mechanics.
Slayer Noir- Partisan
- Number of posts : 1248
Age : 30
Location : Great Britain
Re: Game Mechanics
Well, like I say, I still believe restrictive classes are a bad idea. A tree system sounds nice but as I keep saying, I'm a big fan of the "you can do everything if you put your mind to it" approach, so I'd like it if a player can eventually become a master of all classes - perhaps have some mechanism whereby you switch between classes?
Slayer Noir- Partisan
- Number of posts : 1248
Age : 30
Location : Great Britain
Re: Game Mechanics
I agree with Slayer; I HATE games that restrict your character into a certain class where you can only do a certain thing. The real world doesn't operate that way and it becomes MUCH more cliche and easy to program.
However, starting out and then developing skill later would be excellent.
The tree system shouldn't just be certain trees; they should overlap, and provide mobility from one style to the next, depending on how high you are in the tree.
However, starting out and then developing skill later would be excellent.
The tree system shouldn't just be certain trees; they should overlap, and provide mobility from one style to the next, depending on how high you are in the tree.
Dragon78114- Partisan
- Number of posts : 1668
Age : 31
Location : Annandale-On-Hudson, New York
Re: Game Mechanics
On a sort of dream level, I'd love it if a game could be developed that offered full 3 dimensional fully player malleable land. Then you just introduce land destruction and land creation spells and let a player base loose. It could also be really fun for the admins who would get to shape the land to aid fun.
Dark Avorian- Templar
- Number of posts : 3550
Age : 30
Location : Within the hallowed halls of the mighty, those known only as nobles.
Re: Game Mechanics
Isn't that Minecraft/Terraria?
(I also dislike class systems.) Another issue with split class systems is that you generally segregate the community... One of the reasons I didn't like WoW in the week I tried it was simply the lack of people in the 'beginner' areas... But that's because there are 10 beginner areas that are fictional miles apart. And even if there happens to be someone else, at no point are you really taught how to use the chat system and they are playing a different class and have predominantly different quests.
Okay, so currently our combat mechanic is a class tree system where you start off in the middle, and some of the branches overlap meaning skills can be shared. Would there ever be enough points to be everything? Or should there be a way to replace the points?
Anyone remember that professions thing we did? We could always just use runescape style skills (strength, ranged, magic, etc) and merely have the trees be bonuses. Melee tree: your attacks ignore 5% of your targets armour (as an example of one of the things on the tree). We could make a restricted class system (tank, bruisers, caster) without actually restricting what combat style/weapons you use... So making iit that you can't have super high damage and super high healing.
Inb4 phone doing some crazy predictive.
(I also dislike class systems.) Another issue with split class systems is that you generally segregate the community... One of the reasons I didn't like WoW in the week I tried it was simply the lack of people in the 'beginner' areas... But that's because there are 10 beginner areas that are fictional miles apart. And even if there happens to be someone else, at no point are you really taught how to use the chat system and they are playing a different class and have predominantly different quests.
Okay, so currently our combat mechanic is a class tree system where you start off in the middle, and some of the branches overlap meaning skills can be shared. Would there ever be enough points to be everything? Or should there be a way to replace the points?
Anyone remember that professions thing we did? We could always just use runescape style skills (strength, ranged, magic, etc) and merely have the trees be bonuses. Melee tree: your attacks ignore 5% of your targets armour (as an example of one of the things on the tree). We could make a restricted class system (tank, bruisers, caster) without actually restricting what combat style/weapons you use... So making iit that you can't have super high damage and super high healing.
Inb4 phone doing some crazy predictive.
Re: Game Mechanics
I had an idea for system that I though that didn't go too far or not far enough with the class system with a game I wanted to take on RETROmud which I posted at this location which I still want to make.
invinible- Proselyte
- Number of posts : 149
Age : 42
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Game Mechanics/Gameplay
» Arzonus, the City of Werewolves
» Anybody still playing this game?
» Flash Game Fun
» My video game
» Arzonus, the City of Werewolves
» Anybody still playing this game?
» Flash Game Fun
» My video game
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum