HomeMahjarrat Discussion (spoilers)
+5
Dragon78114
Duskcurse
MorbiusMonster
The Empty Lord
Slayer Noir
9 posters
Page 9 of 9
Page 9 of 9 • 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Mahjarrat Discussion (spoilers)
by Slayer Noir Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:32 am
First topic message reminder :
Felt the need to change the title, as the conversation has moved on from just ROTM...
Felt the need to change the title, as the conversation has moved on from just ROTM...
Last edited by Slayer Noir on Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:08 am; edited 2 times in total
Slayer Noir- Partisan
- Number of posts : 1248
Age : 30
Location : Great Britain
Re: Mahjarrat Discussion (spoilers)
by MorbiusMonster Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:44 am
What about Moia and Lucien?
MorbiusMonster- Templar
- Number of posts : 2641
Re: Mahjarrat Discussion (spoilers)
by MorbiusMonster Thu Jun 21, 2012 8:30 pm
Debates persist over the strenght of Lucien over that of the Dragonkin. Evidence comes to suggest that the Dragonkin were just lucky in combat. Had Lucien not been outnumbered or struck over the head with the staff or been able to avoid the blow to the chest, he presumably would have killed at least one of them.
The Dragonkin's power comes from the use of the stone, but it appears he heeded caution, and used only his strength. It was enough to bring down two of them.
The Dragonkin's power comes from the use of the stone, but it appears he heeded caution, and used only his strength. It was enough to bring down two of them.
MorbiusMonster- Templar
- Number of posts : 2641
Age : 32
Re: Mahjarrat Discussion (spoilers)
by MorbiusMonster Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:38 am
I entered Daemonheim to locate the memory fragment for Nadir. Found it almost instantly.
Unfortunately, my Dungeoneering is only level 52, so I cannot sample the full potential of the Fremmenik Saga. I have completed the other, secondary targets, but they sadly don't count unless I meet Bilrach for some reason.
Unfortunately, my Dungeoneering is only level 52, so I cannot sample the full potential of the Fremmenik Saga. I have completed the other, secondary targets, but they sadly don't count unless I meet Bilrach for some reason.
MorbiusMonster- Templar
- Number of posts : 2641
Age : 32
Re: Mahjarrat Discussion (spoilers)
by MorbiusMonster Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:04 am
I cannot help but feel sorry for the Dragonkin, now that Kerapac's journal has been found. It appears they're in a state of constant pain, thanks to the stone.
Maybe this'll be a crucial element for the next part.
Maybe this'll be a crucial element for the next part.
MorbiusMonster- Templar
- Number of posts : 2641
Age : 32
Re: Mahjarrat Discussion (spoilers)
by The Empty Lord Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:26 am
They are described similar to vampires. An insatiable thought in the back of their mind that isn't theirs. I guess their pain depends on whether they resist it.
The Empty Lord- Admin
- Number of posts : 7344
Age : 32
Location : Plymouth -
Re: Mahjarrat Discussion (spoilers)
by Slayer Noir Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:20 am
The ones I've seen don't seem to put up much of a fight to their urges...
Slayer Noir- Partisan
- Number of posts : 1248
Age : 30
Location : Great Britain
Re: Mahjarrat Discussion (spoilers)
by MorbiusMonster Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:52 pm
Perhaps there is more than one faction, one seems to submit to their anger and let it get the better of them, the others, like Kerapac, channel their pain through their work.
MorbiusMonster- Templar
- Number of posts : 2641
Age : 32
Re: Mahjarrat Discussion (spoilers)
by MorbiusMonster Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:14 am
Well, what do you know? Koschei the Deathless was indeed Kharshai all along!
In a recent mini quest added as part of a hidden update, players with;
*Ritual of the Mahjarrat
*Blood Runs Deep
-can now meet Kharshai!
In a recent mini quest added as part of a hidden update, players with;
*Ritual of the Mahjarrat
*Blood Runs Deep
-can now meet Kharshai!
- Spoiler:
- It is revealed that Kharshai was a neutral Mahjarrat, siding with neither Zaros or Zamorak. He discovered the mineral called "bane" and began to experiment with it, creating Balmung - a weapon that was potent against the likes of Dagannoth and intended to tune it to the blood of the beasts.
En route, he was attacked by an assailant whom he had feared to plan to sacrifice him at the Ritual and so he disguised himself as a human and stored his memories within a toy boat (like the Doctor did in Human Nature). The assailant left Kharshai for dead and branded a mark of Zamorak on his chest.
Brundt found Kharshai's human form drifting at sea and offered his help. Kharshai's memory was all but gone, as he uttered only his name to Brundt, who intiailly misheard it to be Koschei.
MorbiusMonster- Templar
- Number of posts : 2641
Age : 32
Re: Mahjarrat Discussion (spoilers)
by Dark Avorian Fri Feb 22, 2013 7:47 am
Who would ever have guessed...
Dark Avorian- Templar
- Number of posts : 3550
Age : 30
Location : Within the hallowed halls of the mighty, those known only as nobles.
Re: Mahjarrat Discussion (spoilers)
by MorbiusMonster Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:19 pm
- Spoiler:
- With Kharshai now found again, there is still the mystery of who attacked him and provoked him into hiding. If the fact that Zamorak's symbol was branded onto his chest was anything to go by, it might be a case that it was a Zamorakian who was the culprit.
If Zemouregal's notes are anything to go by, he is most likely not the one who sent an assailant after Kharshai - he comes across as confused as to why he didn't attend.
Lucien mentions some "minor" Mahjarrat were missing from the 17th Ritual - however, this may not suggest he is responsible, but it doesn't rule him out.
Enahkra comments on Kharshai "finally showing his face again". Similar to Lucien, this leaves her position on his disappearance unknown.
MorbiusMonster- Templar
- Number of posts : 2641
Age : 32
Re: Mahjarrat Discussion (spoilers)
by MorbiusMonster Thu Jun 06, 2013 7:58 pm
According to the information in the Book of the Gods, Moia made it through the Rift of Daemonheim and met Zamorak. Though no mention of Bilrach making it through.
I have reason to believe that Bilrach did perish on reaching the Rift, thus further enforcing my point that the Nightmare took him.
I have reason to believe that Bilrach did perish on reaching the Rift, thus further enforcing my point that the Nightmare took him.
MorbiusMonster- Templar
- Number of posts : 2641
Age : 32
Page 9 of 9 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Similar topics» [Spoilers] Silence Will Fall
» Re: The True Nightmare
» Monsieur Pooch (blogger discretion advised)
» Mythics: Stagnant Discussion
» Mythics: General Discussion
» Re: The True Nightmare
» Monsieur Pooch (blogger discretion advised)
» Mythics: Stagnant Discussion
» Mythics: General Discussion
Page 9 of 9
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum